HaveComputerWillCode.Com

Welcome!
Life is a Non-Deterministic Finite State Automata
Automation ? (*pGeekiness)++ : Code /eneration;

December 5, 2010

T4 Performance: From TextTemplatingHost to Preprocessed Templates

Filed under: Performance,Programming — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 7:44 am

I’ve been moving my code generators and infrastructure from Visual Studio 2008 to Visual Studio 2010 and making use of the new ‘Preprocessed T4 Templates’ feature. There’s no metrics out there I could find, so here’s mine.

Within 2008, I had my own host that loaded the TT files as they were required, used Microsoft’s Text Templating Engine to parse them on the fly and then generate my code. Performance was pretty good but it meant parsing the TT files every time. 7.5 seconds for 140+ files is admirable!

In 2010, I’ve moved over to Preprocessed Templates and the performance has improved three fold:

In all, there’s about 2 megabytes of generated C# code from the above generation job – in about 2.5 seconds. Preprocessed Templates are clearly the way to go!

My motivation for doing this isn’t speed though. As much as I would like to ship raw T4 templates with my application, it would appear it is not legal to distribute the Text Templating Engine along with your product. This means that unless you are targeting the Visual Studio development community, you cannot rely on the TextTemplating DLL’s being there. So you have to preprocess your templates and distribute a compiled version of that instead. The Engine comes with Visual Studio and various addons (in the Microsoft.VisualStudio.TextTemplating.* DLL’s) so developers don’t notice it’s missing until they distribute their application :-) It would be awesome if Microsoft could push out the T4 Engine as part of a regular update because it’s a mighty useful piece of kit.

The only way around this at the moment (apart from breaking the law or arranging something with the doods in Redmond) is to distribute the C# or VB.Net project containing the T4 files so your customers can regenerate them onsite if they need to modify the output. Or use the Open Source / reverse engineered version mentioned on the Stackoverflow link above. I don’t think either is ideal, but it seems to be the best that can be done at the moment. I would love to hear otherwise!

L8r!

Powered by WordPress